Use case · Workers' comp
Traditional QA reviews 3–5 files per adjuster each quarter — under 5% of the book. Hypermodel reviews every open claim against your service standards, continuously, with examiner-level drill-down.
Dimensions
Workers'-comp-specific checks, not a multiline tool adapted to comp.
Statutory reporting deadlines tracked per claim, per jurisdiction.
Whether the injured worker, employer, and provider were contacted on time.
Reserves flagged when they drift from exposure, before they go stale.
Dormant files surfaced for review.
Overpayments and duplicates identified across the book.
Recovery opportunities flagged before the window closes.
Coverage
Sample QA
Hypermodel
Governance
An explainable audit trail.
Hypermodel audits how claims are handled against your service standards. It is separate from medical-coding and bill-review audit (CPT/ICD recoding or fraud-waste-abuse coding review) — a different problem handled by different tools.
Run it on your files
Send a sample of claim files and we'll return a service-standard scorecard — or book a full walkthrough.